Gene-drug interactions (data source: DGIdb)
Gene Name Entrez ID Drug Name Chembl ID Interaction Types Sources publications
AREG 374 CRIZOTINIB CHEMBL601719 CIViC 21791641
AREG 374 CETUXIMAB CHEMBL1201577 CIViC 23374602
AREG 374 PANITUMUMAB CHEMBL1201827 CIViC 26867820

Variant-drug associations (data source: PharmGKB)
Gene Name Variant Alleles Chemical Phenotype Category Significance Notes Sentence Publications Annotation ID
AREG rs10034692 GG cetuximab efficacy no No significant difference in disease control rate was seen between the genotype groups. Using the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST), disease control rate was the percentage of patients with complete response, partial response or stable disease (as opposed to patients with progressive disease). Genotype GG is not associated with response to cetuximab or panitumumab in people with Colorectal Neoplasms as compared to genotypes AA + AG. 23959273 1184510781
AREG rs3913032 CC cetuximab efficacy no No significant difference in disease control rate was seen between the genotype groups. Using the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST), disease control rate was the percentage of patients with complete response, partial response or stable disease (as opposed to patients with progressive disease). Genotype CC is not associated with response to cetuximab or panitumumab in people with Colorectal Neoplasms as compared to genotypes AA + AC. 23959273 1184510773
AREG rs6447003 CC cetuximab efficacy no No significant difference in disease control rate was seen between the genotype groups. Using the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST), disease control rate was the percentage of patients with complete response, partial response or stable disease (as opposed to patients with progressive disease). Genotype CC is not associated with response to cetuximab or panitumumab in people with Colorectal Neoplasms as compared to genotypes CG + GG. 23959273 1184510777
AREG rs9996584 AA cetuximab efficacy yes Patients with the AA genotype showed significantly higher disease control rate (89%) as compared to those with the AC (80%) or CC (60%) genotype. Using the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST), disease control rate was the percentage of patients with complete response, partial response or stable disease (as opposed to patients with progressive disease). Please note alleles have been complemented to the plus chromosomal strand. Genotype AA is associated with increased response to cetuximab or panitumumab in people with Colorectal Neoplasms as compared to genotypes AG + GG. 23959273 1184510644
AREG rs11725706 GG cetuximab efficacy no No significant difference in disease control rate was seen between the genotype groups. Using the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST), disease control rate was the percentage of patients with complete response, partial response or stable disease (as opposed to patients with progressive disease). Genotype GG is not associated with response to cetuximab or panitumumab in people with Colorectal Neoplasms as compared to genotypes AA + AG. 23959273 1184510785
AREG rs13104811 GG cetuximab efficacy yes Patients with the GG genotype showed significantly higher disease control rate (100%) as compared to those with the AA or AG (70%) genotype. Using the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST), disease control rate was the percentage of patients with complete response, partial response or stable disease (as opposed to patients with progressive disease). Genotype GG is associated with increased response to cetuximab or panitumumab in people with Colorectal Neoplasms as compared to genotypes AA + AG. 23959273 1184510631
AREG rs11942466 AA + AC capecitabine efficacy yes p-value and OR below for multivariate analysis. In univariate analysis, 35.7% of those with the CC genotype achieved pathological complete response, compared with 19.4% of those with the AC genotype and 0% of those with the AA genotype. Genotypes AA + AC is associated with decreased response to capecitabine and radiotherapy in people with Rectal Neoplasms as compared to genotype CC. 25026457 1444934680
AREG rs11942466 AA cetuximab efficacy yes Patients with the AA genotype showed significantly lower disease control rate (25%) as compared to those with the AC (72%) or CC (85%) genotype. Using the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST), disease control rate was the percentage of patients with complete response, partial response or stable disease (as opposed to patients with progressive disease). Genotype AA is associated with decreased response to cetuximab or panitumumab in people with Colorectal Neoplasms as compared to genotypes AC + CC. 23959273 1184510640
AREG rs1353295 GG cetuximab efficacy yes Patients with the GG genotype showed significantly higher disease control rate (100%) as compared to those with the AA or AG (72%) genotype. Using the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST), disease control rate was the percentage of patients with complete response, partial response or stable disease (as opposed to patients with progressive disease). Genotype GG is associated with increased response to cetuximab or panitumumab in people with Colorectal Neoplasms as compared to genotypes AA + AG. 23959273 1184510648
AREG rs2132065 AA cetuximab efficacy no No significant difference in disease control rate was seen between the genotype groups. Using the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST), disease control rate was the percentage of patients with complete response, partial response or stable disease (as opposed to patients with progressive disease). Genotype AA is not associated with response to cetuximab or panitumumab in people with Colorectal Neoplasms as compared to genotypes AT + TT. 23959273 1184510789